Standard Document
First Edition
Method Evaluation

CLSI EP36

Harmonization of Symbology and Equations

This report introduces a standardized symbology designed to enhance clarity and consistency across all CLSI documents. By adopting these standardized symbols, CLSI aims to significantly improve the experience for its readers, volunteers, and the entire scientific community, making complex information more accessible and understandable, ensuring this document is a valuable resource for anyone involved in clinical laboratory science.

 

June 18, 2015
Robert Magari, PhD

{{FormatPrice(currentPrice)}}

Free

{{FormatPrice(nonMemberPrice)}} List Price
This is your member pricing.
Notify Me About New Editions
Abstract

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute document EP36—Harmonization of Symbology and Equations provides readers with a list of the most common statistical symbols and formulas to describe testing procedures and statistical analyses. The purpose is to provide a standardized symbology for use in CLSI documents that will benefit the CLSI readership as well as the volunteers participating on CLSI committees. Symbols are based on International Organization for Standardization guidelines and the most recent CLSI documents. They are grouped in different categories related to performance evaluation testing. CLSI document development committees and working groups are expected to adhere to these symbols unless there are strong arguments for deviating from these recommendations.

Scope

The purpose of this document is to provide recommendations on harmonized symbols and notations that describe concepts, procedures, and test approaches used in statistical equations and models within CLSI documents. 

The intended users of this document are CLSI volunteers and staff involved in developing standards, guidelines, and related products. It is intended that future CLSI documents will converge to a more standardized symbolism and notation by taking into account the recommendations made in this document. This document is not intended to cover all mathematical symbols and operations nor all statistical procedures used or referenced in CLSI documents.

Product Details
EP36Ed1E
1-56238-906-8
32
Additional Details

This document is available in electronic format only.

Authors
Robert Magari, PhD
David A. Armbruster, PhD, DABCC, FACB
David L. Duewer, PhD
A. Paul Durham
Anders Kallner, MD, PhD
Jeffrey E. Vaks, PhD
Abstract

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute document EP36—Harmonization of Symbology and Equations provides readers with a list of the most common statistical symbols and formulas to describe testing procedures and statistical analyses. The purpose is to provide a standardized symbology for use in CLSI documents that will benefit the CLSI readership as well as the volunteers participating on CLSI committees. Symbols are based on International Organization for Standardization guidelines and the most recent CLSI documents. They are grouped in different categories related to performance evaluation testing. CLSI document development committees and working groups are expected to adhere to these symbols unless there are strong arguments for deviating from these recommendations.

Scope

The purpose of this document is to provide recommendations on harmonized symbols and notations that describe concepts, procedures, and test approaches used in statistical equations and models within CLSI documents. 

The intended users of this document are CLSI volunteers and staff involved in developing standards, guidelines, and related products. It is intended that future CLSI documents will converge to a more standardized symbolism and notation by taking into account the recommendations made in this document. This document is not intended to cover all mathematical symbols and operations nor all statistical procedures used or referenced in CLSI documents.

Additional Details

This document is available in electronic format only.

Authors
Robert Magari, PhD
David A. Armbruster, PhD, DABCC, FACB
David L. Duewer, PhD
A. Paul Durham
Anders Kallner, MD, PhD
Jeffrey E. Vaks, PhD